<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikkor 18-200VR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monte Gordo, Portugal : Images and [re]views</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Monte Gordo, Portugal : Images and [re]views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] All images were done with a Nikon D300 DSLR with a 18-200VR zoom lens. I wrote a more detailed hands-on report about the lens here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All images were done with a Nikon D300 DSLR with a 18-200VR zoom lens. I wrote a more detailed hands-on report about the lens here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PerL</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>PerL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I have not tried any of the third party alternatives, but I doubt they would better in any significant way. The Nikon is probably about as good as it gets for an 11x zoom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not tried any of the third party alternatives, but I doubt they would better in any significant way. The Nikon is probably about as good as it gets for an 11x zoom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Great post. I really enjoyed it. Would you recommend any other 18-200 lens for Nikon bodies? I&#039;d like to get the new D90 and will be traveling for a few months so I want a good all around lens. The dpreview of the 18-200 Nikon left me a bit disappointed. Is there perhaps a different brand with the same range that is better in image quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I really enjoyed it. Would you recommend any other 18-200 lens for Nikon bodies? I&#8217;d like to get the new D90 and will be traveling for a few months so I want a good all around lens. The dpreview of the 18-200 Nikon left me a bit disappointed. Is there perhaps a different brand with the same range that is better in image quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Nice review on the 18-200. I purchased mine along with the D300 the week before MotoGP at Laguna Seca. I took close to 2000 images with the rapid fire mode and was very pleased with the results. Of course I still have a lot to learn about this camera so I am reading more. I didn&#039;t find it too heavy and even took it for a ride on my motorcycle on parade lap around the track. The color was great as well and I liked the versatility of this lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review on the 18-200. I purchased mine along with the D300 the week before MotoGP at Laguna Seca. I took close to 2000 images with the rapid fire mode and was very pleased with the results. Of course I still have a lot to learn about this camera so I am reading more. I didn&#8217;t find it too heavy and even took it for a ride on my motorcycle on parade lap around the track. The color was great as well and I liked the versatility of this lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PerL</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>PerL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-43</guid>
		<description>To Francis:
I wrote this on dpreview about 16-85 vs 18-200:
I think it is a very difficult decision. The 16-85 seems to very good according to reviews and probably has the edge optically. 24 mm was a favourite focal length on my film SLRs, so 16mm  is more attractive than 18mm IMO.
On the other the 18-200 is an unique lens. It is not only the convinience factor, but I also think it has a creative plus, in the way that you can instantly try out very different compositions. About the 17-55: Check my mini review here on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Francis:<br />
I wrote this on dpreview about 16-85 vs 18-200:<br />
I think it is a very difficult decision. The 16-85 seems to very good according to reviews and probably has the edge optically. 24 mm was a favourite focal length on my film SLRs, so 16mm  is more attractive than 18mm IMO.<br />
On the other the 18-200 is an unique lens. It is not only the convinience factor, but I also think it has a creative plus, in the way that you can instantly try out very different compositions. About the 17-55: Check my mini review here on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Hi!  I&#039;ve just bought a D300 and still uncertain on which lense to buy.  I&#039;ve been considering the new 16-85 VR vs. 18-200 VR, and the high cost 17-55 2.8.  Can you advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!  I&#8217;ve just bought a D300 and still uncertain on which lense to buy.  I&#8217;ve been considering the new 16-85 VR vs. 18-200 VR, and the high cost 17-55 2.8.  Can you advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bram</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Great post. I have been considering the 18-200 to purchase with a D60 and found this of real value to help my decision. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I have been considering the 18-200 to purchase with a D60 and found this of real value to help my decision. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tule creek</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>tule creek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-27</guid>
		<description>this is very helpful.  thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is very helpful.  thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PerL</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>PerL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-7</guid>
		<description>To Ron:
Thanks for the nice words Ron. I am also glad you liked the blog set up, it took me a while to figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ron:<br />
Thanks for the nice words Ron. I am also glad you liked the blog set up, it took me a while to figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/hands-on-nikkor-18-200vr/nikkor-18-200vr/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonusphotography.wordpress.com/?page_id=115#comment-6</guid>
		<description>This post is very impressive.  Not only the discussion about the 18-200, but the links and the quality of the photos you post.  I have an 18-200 and have had some reservations about it&#039;s sharpness on my D300 (worked well on my D100).  So your clear, crisp photos give me hope that i can get it tuned a bit better.

Your blog set up was GREAT&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is very impressive.  Not only the discussion about the 18-200, but the links and the quality of the photos you post.  I have an 18-200 and have had some reservations about it&#8217;s sharpness on my D300 (worked well on my D100).  So your clear, crisp photos give me hope that i can get it tuned a bit better.</p>
<p>Your blog set up was GREAT&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
